July 13, 2026
10 min read
By Albert Wong, PhD · Clinical Psychologist
The short answer
SimplePractice wins on client-facing experience — portal, booking, apps, polish. TherapyNotes wins on insurance billing and phone support. Insurance-heavy practices should pick TherapyNotes; private-pay practices competing on client experience should pick SimplePractice; and if the real problem is documentation time, neither solves it without a paid add-on — which is where the newer AI-native EHRs enter the comparison.
| SimplePractice | TherapyNotes | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (2026) | ~$49–$99/mo | ~$69/mo |
| Insurance billing | Adequate | Best in category |
| Client portal & apps | Best in category | Basic |
| Support | Chat/email queues | Phone, fast |
| AI notes | Paid add-on (~$25–$40/mo) | Paid add-on (~$25–$40/mo) |
| Best for | Private-pay; client experience | Insurance-heavy practices |
If you're choosing between SimplePractice and TherapyNotes, you're choosing between the two gravitational centers of the therapy-EHR market — and between two genuinely different philosophies of what practice software is for.
SimplePractice believes the product is the experience: yours and your clients'. Clean interface, slick portal, online booking, an app for everything. TherapyNotes believes the product is the infrastructure: claims that go out clean, denials you can chase, a phone number a human answers. Both beliefs are correct — for different practices.
Full disclosure before the referee blows the whistle: I founded a third EHR, Practice Harbor. I'll tell you when that matters at the end; the comparison itself stands on its own.
Documentation time. Both are fundamentally typing platforms: templates help you structure the note, but the note is still you, at a keyboard, after your last client. Both now sell AI note-taking as a paid add-on (roughly $25–40/month extra), and both add-ons are younger than the standalone scribes they're competing with. If notes are your bottleneck, neither default configuration solves it — you're buying the add-on either way, which changes the price math (the full AI note-taker comparison).
Here's where my disclosure matters. This head-to-head assumes the 2015 framing: pick the least-bad typing platform and pay $50–100/month plus add-ons. If what actually drove you to compare EHRs is the hour of documentation after your last session, the honest answer might be neither — the newest generation of therapy EHRs treats AI documentation as the core of the product rather than an upsell. Ours is one ( the full shortlist comparison is here), it's $19/month licensed and free for pre-licensed clinicians, and the trade-off is youth: we don't have TherapyNotes' fifteen years of billing scar tissue or SimplePractice's ecosystem. You should weigh that honestly — the same way this article weighed them.
Albert Wong, PhD, is a clinical psychologist and the founder of Practice Harbor.
Neither is better in the abstract: SimplePractice has the best mainstream client experience (portal, booking, apps) and TherapyNotes has the best insurance-billing engine and phone support. Choose by what dominates your week — client-facing polish or claims volume.
They land in a similar band: SimplePractice runs roughly $49–99/month depending on plan, and TherapyNotes about $69/month for a solo clinician (with very low per-claim fees). AI note-taking is a paid add-on on both, typically $25–40/month more.
TherapyNotes, clearly — claim scrubbing, payer connections, ERA posting, and denial workflows are its core, and its support staff can actually talk billing on the phone.
The newer generation of AI-native therapy EHRs treats documentation as the core product instead of an upsell. Practice Harbor is one: AI-drafted notes included at $19/month (free for pre-licensed clinicians), with scheduling, telehealth, portal, and e-claims in the same chart. The trade-off is a shorter track record than the two incumbents.
AI-drafted notes included at $19/month — free while you're pre-licensed. Scheduling, telehealth, portal, and e-claims in the same chart.